Human Computer Interaction

ACI ’24: Proceedings of the international conference on animal-computer interaction. (2024). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3702336

Adiwangsa, M., Bransky, K., Wood, E., & Sweetser, P. (2025). A game of ChARades: Using role-playing and mimicry with and without tangible objects to ideate immersive augmented reality experiences. Companion Publication of the 2025 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 440–445. https://doi.org/10.1145/3715668.3736382

Adiwangsa, M., Sweetser, P., Stevenson, D., Suominen, H., & Xi, M. (2024). Exploring opportunities for augmenting homes to support exercising. Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3641897

Alavi, H. S., Churchill, E. F., Wiberg, M., Lalanne, D., Dalsgaard, P., Fatah gen Schieck, A., & Rogers, Y. (2019). Introduction to human-building interaction (hbi) interfacing hci with architecture and urban design. In ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) (No. 2; Vol. 26, pp. 1–10). ACM New York, NY, USA.

Alexander, J., Roudaut, A., Steimle, J., Hornbæk, K., Bruns Alonso, M., Follmer, S., & Merritt, T. (2018). Grand challenges in shape-changing interface research. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–14.

Alharthi, S. A., Alsaedi, O., Toups Dugas, P. O., Tanenbaum, T. J., & Hammer, J. (2018). Playing to wait: A taxonomy of idle games. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174195

Altmann, E. M., & Trafton, J. G. (2002). Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cognitive Science, 26(1), 39–83. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2601_2

Ambe, A. H., Brereton, M., Soro, A., & Roe, P. (2017). Technology individuation: The foibles of augmented everyday objects. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 6632–6644. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025770

Apple Developer. (2019). Human interface guidelines. https://developer.apple.com/design/human-interface-guidelines/ios/overview/themes/.

Arawjo, I. (2024). LLM wrapper papers are hurting HCI research. Medium. https://ianarawjo.medium.com/llm-wrapper-papers-are-hurting-hci-research-8ad416a5d59a

Baalman, M. (2022). Composing interactions: An artist’s guide to building expressive interactive systems. V2_Publishing.

Babich, N. (2018). The do’s and don’ts of mobile UX design. https://theblog.adobe.com/10-dos-donts-mobile-ux-design.

Bailenson, J. N. (2021). Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of zoom fatigue. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030

Bainbridge, L. (1983). Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19(6), 775–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(83)90046-8

Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3), 114–123.

Bansal, G., Wu, T., Zhou, J., Fok, R., Nushi, B., Kamar, E., Ribeiro, M. T., & Weld, D. (2021). Does the whole exceed its parts? The effect of AI explanations on complementary team performance. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445717

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128

Bastani, H., Bastani, O., Sungu, A., Ge, H., Kabakcı, Ö., & Mariman, R. (2025). Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(26). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422633122

Becker, J., Rush, N., Barnes, E., & Rein, D. (2025). Measuring the impact of early-2025 AI on experienced open-source developer productivity. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.09089

Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Anderson, B., Jacobs, R., Golembewski, M., Jirotka, M., Stahl, B. C., Timmermans, J., Giannachi, G., Adams, M., Farr, J. R., Tandavanitj, N., & Jennings, K. (2015). The ethical implications of HCI’s turn to the cultural. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 22(5). https://doi.org/10.1145/2775107

Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Crabtree, A., Flintham, M., Walker, B., Marshall, J., Koleva, B., Rennick Egglestone, S., Giannachi, G., Adams, M., Tandavanitj, N., & Row Farr, J. (2013). Performance-led research in the wild. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1145/2491500.2491502

Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1997). Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. https://doi.org/0.5555/2821566

Bidwell, N. J., Reitmaier, T., Marsden, G., & Hansen, S. (2010). Designing with mobile digital storytelling in rural africa. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1593–1602. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753564

Billinghurst, M., Clark, A., & Lee, G. (2015). A survey of augmented reality. now. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000049

Blaikie, N. W. H. (1991). A critique of the use of triangulation in social research. Quality and Quantity, 25(2), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145701

Blandford, A., & Furniss, D. (2006). DiCoT: A methodology for applying distributed cognition to the design of teamworking systems. In Interactive systems. Design, specification, and verification (pp. 26–38). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11752707_3

Boden, M. A. (1998). Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 103(1), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00055-1

Bødker, S. (2006). When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182476

Bødker, S. (2015). Third-wave HCI, 10 years later—participation and sharing. Interactions, 22(5), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2804405

Boren, T., & Ramey, J. (2000). Thinking aloud: Reconciling theory and practice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 43(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1109/47.867942

Bos, N., Olson, J., Gergle, D., Olson, G., & Wright, Z. (2002). Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1145/503376.503401

Bouchet, J., & Nigay, L. (2004). ICARE: A component-based approach for the design and development of multimodal interfaces. CHI’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1325–1328. https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986055

Bown, O. (2021). Beyond the creative species: Making machines that make art and music. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10913.001.0001

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage Publications.

Brooke, J. (1995). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind., 189.

Brown, B., Weilenmann, A., McMillan, D., & Lampinen, A. (2016). Five provocations for ethical HCI research. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 852–863. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858313

Brown, C., & Gajewski, C. (2025). Dinosaur choir: Adult corythosaurus. In S. Rose, J. Mulder, & N. Carroll (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on new interfaces for musical expression (pp. 138–141). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17801164

Brumby, D. P., & Zhuang, S. (2015). Visual grouping in menu interfaces. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4203–4206. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702177

Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2025). Generative AI at work. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 140(2), 889–942. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjae044

Bryson, J. j. (2020). The artificial intelligence of the ethics of artificial intelligence: An introductory overview for law. The Oxford Handbook of the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.

Buçinca, Z., Malaya, M. B., & Gajos, K. Z. (2021). To trust or to think: Cognitive forcing functions can reduce overreliance on AI in AI-assisted decision-making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449287

Budd, A. (2007). Heuristics for modern WEb application development. https://andybudd.com/archives/2007/01/heuristics_for_modern_web_application_de

Buxton, B. (1997). Artists and the art of the luthier. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph., 31(1), 10–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/248307.248315

Buxton, B. (2007). Sketching user experiences: Getting the design right and the right design. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.

Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of braun and clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Caine, K. (2016). Local standards for sample size at CHI. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 981–992. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858498

Candy, L., & Ferguson, S. (2014). Interactive experience in the digital age: Evaluating new art practice (L. Candy & S. Ferguson, Eds.). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04510-8

Caraban, A., Karapanos, E., Gonçalves, D., & Campos, P. (2019). 23 ways to nudge: A review of technology-mediated nudging in human-computer interaction. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300733

Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203736166

Carden, F. (2023). Personas: Learn how to discover your audience, understand them, and pivot to address their needs. Digital.gov website. https://digital.gov/2023/05/19/personas-learn-how-to-discover-your-audience-understand-them-and-pivot-to-address-their-needs

Carroll, E. A., & Latulipe, C. (2009). The creativity support index. CHI ’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4009–4014. https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520609

Carroll, J. M. (2004). Beyond fun. Interactions, 11(5), 38–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/1015530.1015547

Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (1992). Getting around the task-artifact cycle: How to make claims and design by scenario. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 10(2), 181–212. https://doi.org/10.1145/146802.146834

Carter, S., & Mankoff, J. (2005). When participants do the capturing: The role of media in diary studies. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 899–908. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055098

Chai, M. Z., Soro, A., Roe, P., & Brereton, M. (2017). Cooking together at a distance: Sustain connectedness for long distance families. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2437–2444. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053183

Chamberlain, A., Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., Jones, M., & Rogers, Y. (2012). Research in the wild: Understanding “in the wild” approaches to design and development. Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 795–796. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318078

Chen, Z., Lu, Y., Nieminen, M. P., & Lucero, A. (2020). Creating a chatbot for and with migrants: Chatbot personality drives co-design activities. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395495

Cheng, A., Yang, L., & Andersen, E. (2017). Teaching language and culture with a virtual reality game. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 541–549. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025857

Cherry, E., & Latulipe, C. (2014). Quantifying the creativity support of digital tools through the creativity support index. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1145/2617588

Chignell, M., Wang, L., Zare, A., & Li, J. (2023). The evolution of HCI and human factors: Integrating human and artificial intelligence. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1145/3557891

Choi, M., Andres, J., Hunter, A., & Martin, C. P. (2025). Scenario-based design to envision how GenAI can support sound design practices. Proceedings of the 36th Australasian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 640–646. https://doi.org/10.1145/3726986.3727042

Choi, M., Andres, J., & Martin, C. P. (2024). Tonal cognition in sonification: Exploring the needs of practitioners in sonic interaction design. Proceedings of the 19th International Audio Mostly Conference: Explorations in Sonic Cultures, 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1145/3678299.3678321

Clegg, T., Boston, C., Preece, J., Warrick, E., Pauw, D., & Cameron, J. (2020). Community-driven informal adult environmental learning: Using theory as a lens to identify steps toward concientización. The Journal of Environmental Education, 51(1), 55–71.

Cockburn, A., Quinn, P., & Gutwin, C. (2015). Examining the peak-end effects of subjective experience. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702139

Cohen, M. H., Giangola, J. P., & Balogh, J. (2004). Voice user interface design. Addison-Wesley Professional.

Cole, S. (2023a). “It’s hurting like hell”: AI companion users are in crisis, reporting sudden sexual rejection. Vice. https://www.vice.com/en/article/ai-companion-replika-erotic-roleplay-updates/

Cole, S. (2023b). Replika brings back erotic AI roleplay for some users after outcry. Vice. https://www.vice.com/en/article/replika-brings-back-erotic-ai-roleplay-for-some-users-after-outcry/

Consolvo, S., McDonald, D. W., Toscos, T., Chen, M. Y., Froehlich, J., Harrison, B., Klasnja, P., LaMarca, A., LeGrand, L., Libby, R., Smith, I., & Landay, J. A. (2008). Activity sensing in the wild: A field trial of ubifit garden. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1797–1806. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357335

Constine, J. (2018). Snapchat shrinks by 3M users to 188M despite strong Q2. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2018/08/07/snapchat-earnings-q2-2018/

Cooper, A., Reimann, R., Cronin, D., & Noessel, C. (2014). About face: The essentials of interaction design. John Wiley & Sons.

Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications.

Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359277

Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., Tolmie, P., & Button, G. (2009). Ethnography considered harmful. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 879–888. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518835

Dam, R. F., & Siang, T. Y. (2020). Design thinking: Get started with prototyping. Interaction Design Foundation website. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/design-thinking-get-started-with-prototyping

Dam, R. F., & Siang, T. Y. (2025). Personas - a simple introduction. Interaction Design Foundation Website. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/personas-why-and-how-you-should-use-them

David, R. A., & Nielsen, P. (2016). Defense science board summer study on autonomy.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Davis, N., Hsiao, C., Singh, K. Y., Lin, B., & Magerko, B. (2017). Quantifying collaboration with a co-creative drawing agent. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst., 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1145/3009981

DeCuir-Gunby, J. T., Marshall, P. L., & McCulloch, A. W. (2011). Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: An example from a professional development research project. Field Methods, 23(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X10388468

Dell’Acqua, F., McFowland, E., Mollick, E., Lifshitz, H., Kellogg, K. C., Rajendran, S., Krayer, L., Candelon, F., & Lakhani, K. R. (2026). Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of artificial intelligence on knowledge worker productivity and quality. Organization Science, 37(2), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2025.21838

Delwiche, L. D., & Slaughter, S. J. (2019). The little SAS book: A primer. SAS institute.

Deng, J., Olivier, P., Andres, J., Ellis, K., Wee, R., & Floyd Mueller, F. (2022). Logic bonbon: Exploring food as computational artifact. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501926

Deng, L., & Huang, X. (2004). Challenges in adopting speech recognition. Communications of the ACM, 47(1), 69–75.

Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543

Design Council. (2025). The double diamond: A universally accepted depiction of the design process. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-resources/the-double-diamond/

Desjardins, A., Tomico, O., Lucero, A., Cecchinato, M. E., & Neustaedter, C. (2021). Introduction to the special issue on first-person methods in HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 28(6), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3492342

Dix, A., Ormerod, T., Twidale, M., Sas, C., Silva, P. A., & McKnight, L. (2006). Why bad ideas are a good idea. HCI Educators Workshop 2006. https://alandix.com/academic/papers/HCIed2006-badideas/HCIED2006-badideas-CRC-v2.pdf

Doorley, S., Holcomb, S., Klebahn, P., Segovia, K., & Utley, J. (2018). Design thinking bootleg. Stanford dSchool website. https://dschool.stanford.edu/tools/design-thinking-bootleg

Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. MIT press.

Dourish, P. (2006). Implications for design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 541–550. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124855

Dumas, B., Lalanne, D., & Oviatt, S. (2009). Multimodal interfaces: A survey of principles, models and frameworks. In Human machine interaction: Research results of the mmi program (pp. 3–26). Springer.

Edmonds, E. (2010). The art of interaction. Digital Creativity, 21(4), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2010.556347

Edmonds, E. (2018). The art of interaction: What HCI can learn from interactive art. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00825ED1V01Y201802HCI039

Ehn, P. (2008). Participation in design things. Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008, 92–101.

Erickson, T. D. (1995). Working with interface metaphors. In R. M. Baecker, J. Grudin, W. A. S. Buxton, & S. Greenberg (Eds.), Readings in human-computer interaction (pp. 147–151). Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-051574-8.50018-2

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215

Eysenck, M. W., & Brysbaert, M. (2023). Fundamentals of cognition (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003384694

Fan, M., Shi, S., & Truong, K. N. (2020). Practices and challenges of using think-aloud protocols in industry: An international survey. Journal of Usability Studies, 15(2), 85–102. https://uxpajournal.org/practices-challenges-think-aloud-protocols-survey/

Federal Trade Commission. (2011). FTC charges deceptive privacy practices in Google’s rollout of its Buzz social network. Press release, 30 March 2011. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2011/03/ftc-charges-deceptive-privacy-practices-googles-rollout-its-buzz-social-network

Felix Navarro, K., Syriani, E., & Arawjo, I. (2026). Reporting and reviewing LLM-integrated systems in HCI: Challenges and considerations. Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3790439

Feng, K. J. K., McDonald, D. W., & Zhang, A. X. (2025). Levels of autonomy for AI agents. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.12469

Fiebrink, R. (2019). Machine learning education for artists, musicians, and other creative practitioners. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 19(4), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3294008

Fiebrink, R., Cook, P. R., & Trueman, D. (2011). Human model evaluation in interactive supervised learning. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978965

Fiebrink, R., Trueman, D., & Cook, P. R. (2009). A meta-instrument for interactive, on-the-fly machine learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1177513

Fiesler, C., & Proferes, N. (2018). “Participant” perceptions of Twitter research ethics. Social Media + Society, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366

Finn, K., & Johnson, J. (2016). Designing for an aging population: Toward universal design. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1011–1012. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2856669

Fish, R. S., Kraut, R. E., & Chalfonte, B. L. (1990). The VideoWindow system in informal communication. Proceedings of the 1990 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW ’90, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/99332.99335

Fishkin, K. P. (2004). A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8(5), 347–358.

Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(6), 381.

Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061470

Fogg, B. (2009). A behavior model for persuasive design. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1541999

Frame, C., O’Hara, S., Trolland, S., & Ilsar, A. (2025). AirPens: Musical doodling. In S. Rose, J. Mulder, & N. Carroll (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on new interfaces for musical expression (pp. 65–67). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17801083

Françoise, J., Fdili Alaoui, S., & Candau, Y. (2022). CO/DA: Live-coding movement-sound interactions for dance improvisation. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501916

Frauenberger, C. (2019). Entanglement HCI the next wave? ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3364998

Frayling, C. (1993). Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1), 1–5.

Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., & Landay, J. (2010). The design of eco-feedback technology. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1999–2008. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753629

Gaver, B., & Bowers, J. (2012). Annotated portfolios. Interactions, 19(4), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212877.2212889

Gaver, B., Dunne, T., & Pacenti, E. (1999). Design: Cultural probes. Interactions, 6(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291235

Gaver, W. (2012). What should we expect from research through design? Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 937–946. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538

Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/108844.108856

Gentner, D., & Nielsen, J. (1996). The anti-mac interface. Commun. ACM, 39(8), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/232014.232032

Gibbons, S. (2018). Journey mapping 101. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/journey-mapping-101/

Gilbert, S. J., Boldt, A., Sachdeva, C., Scarampi, C., & Tsai, P.-C. (2022). Outsourcing memory to external tools: A review of ’intention offloading’. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02139-4

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company.

Goldberg, D., & Richardson, C. (1993). Touch-typing with a stylus. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’93), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1145/169059.169093

Google. (2020). Crazy 8’s. Google Design Sprint Kit webpage. https://designsprintkit.withgoogle.com/methodology/phase3-sketch/crazy-8s

Gould, J. D., & Lewis, C. (1985). Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Commun. ACM, 28(3), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1145/3166.3170

Grant, N., & Hill, K. (2023). Google’s photo app still can’t find gorillas. And neither can Apple’s. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/22/technology/ai-photo-labels-google-apple.html

Gray, W., John, B., & Atwood, M. (1993). Project ernestine: Validating a GOMS analysis for predicting and explaining real-world task performance. Human-Computer Interaction, 8(3), 237–309. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0803_3

Greenberg, S., & Buxton, B. (2008). Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time). Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357074

Greenberg, S., Carpendale, S., Marquardt, N., & Buxton, B. (2012). Sketching user experiences: The workbook. Morgan Kaufmann.

Greenwold, S. (2003). Spatial computing [Master’s thesis]. School of Architecture; Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Groom, V., & Nass, C. (2007). Can robots be teammates?: Benchmarks in human–robot teams [Journal Article]. Interaction Studies, 8(3), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.8.3.10gro

Hallewell, M. J., Hughes, N., Large, D. R., Harvey, C., Springthorpe, J., & Burnett, G. (2022). Deriving personas to inform HMI design for future autonomous taxis: A case study on user requirement elicitation. Journal of Usability Studies, 17(2).

Hanson, K. R., & Bolthouse, H. (2024). “Replika removing erotic role-play is like Grand Theft Auto removing guns or cars”: Reddit discourse on artificial intelligence chatbots and sexual technologies. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231241259627

Harrison, J., Jack, R. H., Morreale, F., & McPherson, A. P. (2018). When is a guitar not a guitar? Cultural form, input modality and expertise. In T. M. Luke Dahl Douglas Bowman (Ed.), Proceedings of the international conference on new interfaces for musical expression (pp. 299–304). Virginia Tech. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1302589

Hart, S. G. (2006). NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(9), 904–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909

Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. 52, 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9

Henkel, L. A. (2014). Point-and-shoot memories: The influence of taking photos on memory for a museum tour. Psychological Science, 25(2), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504438

Höök, K., Caramiaux, B., Erkut, C., Forlizzi, J., Hajinejad, N., Haller, M., Hummels, C. C. M., Isbister, K., Jonsson, M., Khut, G., Loke, L., Lottridge, D., Marti, P., Melcer, E., Müller, F. F., Petersen, M. G., Schiphorst, T., Márquez Segura, E., Ståhl, A., … Tobiasson, H. (2018). Embracing first-person perspectives in soma-based design. Informatics, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics5010008

Hooper, S., Preston, A., Balaam, M., Seedhouse, P., Jackson, D., Pham, C., Ladha, C., Ladha, K., Plötz, T., & Olivier, P. (2012). The french kitchen: Task-based learning in an instrumented kitchen. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370246

Hornbæk, K., Kristensson, P. O., & Oulasvirta, A. (2025). Introduction to human-computer interaction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192864543.001.0001

Hornecker, E. (2005). A design theme for tangible interaction: Embodied facilitation. ECSCW 2005: Proceedings of the Ninth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 18–22 September 2005, Paris, France, 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4023-7_2

Horvitz, E. (1999). Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1145/302979.303030

Houde, S., & Hill, C. (1997). What do prototypes prototype? In M. G. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P. V. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 367–381). North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044481862-1.50082-0

Hutchins, E. (1995). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19(3), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1903_1

Hutchins, E. L., Hollan, J. D., & Norman, D. A. (1986). Direct manipulation interfaces. In User centered system design (pp. 87–124). CRC Press. https://worrydream.com/refs/Hutchins_1985_-_Direct_Manipulation_Interfaces.pdf

Isaacs, E., Konrad, A., Walendowski, A., Lennig, T., Hollis, V., & Whittaker, S. (2013). Echoes from the past: How technology mediated reflection improves well-being. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1071–1080. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466137

Ishii, H., & Ullmer, B. (1997). Tangible bits: Towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 234–241.

Jakesch, M., Bhat, A., Buschek, D., Zalmanson, L., & Naaman, M. (2023). Co-writing with opinionated language models affects users’ views. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581196

Je, S., Lim, H., Moon, K., Teng, S.-Y., Brooks, J., Lopes, P., & Bianchi, A. (2021). Elevate: A walkable pin-array for large shape-changing terrains. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445454

Jeon, M., Fiebrink, R., Edmonds, E. A., & Herath, D. (2019). From rituals to magic: Interactive art and HCI of the past, present, and future. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 131, 108–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.06.005

Jordà, S. (2003). Sonigraphical instruments: From FMOL to the reacTable*. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1176519

Jordà, S. (2010). The reactable: Tangible and tabletop music performance. In CHI’10 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2989–2994).

Jordà, S. (2017). 2003: Sonigraphical instruments: From FMOL to the reacTable*. In A. R. Jensenius & M. J. Lyons (Eds.), A NIME reader: Fifteen years of new interfaces for musical expression (pp. 89–106). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47214-0_7

Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401\_2

Kahn, R. L., & Cannell, C. F. (1957). The dynamics of interviewing; theory, technique, and cases. John Wiley & Sons.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus; Giroux.

Kaptein, M. C., Nass, C., & Markopoulos, P. (2010). Powerful and consistent analysis of likert-type rating scales. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2391–2394. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753686

Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B., Bødker, S., Carroll, J., Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Winograd, T. (2003). Post-cognitivist HCI: Second-wave theories. CHI ’03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 692–693. https://doi.org/10.1145/765891.765933

Kempton, W. (1986). Two theories of home heat control. Cognitive Science, 10(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0364-0213(86)80009-x

Kim, S. S. Y., Liao, Q. V., Vorvoreanu, M., Ballard, S., & Vaughan, J. W. (2024). “I’m not sure, but...”: Examining the impact of large language models’ uncertainty expression on user reliance and trust. The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency, 822–835. https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658941

King, A. (2008). In vivo coding. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n240

Kirsh, D. (2013). Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/2442106.2442109

Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18(4), 513–549. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1804_1

Klein, L. (2014). What do we actually mean by “sociotechnical”? On values, boundaries and the problems of language. Applied Ergonomics, 45(2), 137–142.

Kleinberger, R., Dublon, G., Paradiso, J. A., & Machover, T. (2015). PHOX ears: A parabolic, head-mounted, orientable, eXtrasensory listening device. In E. Berdahl & J. Allison (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on new interfaces for musical expression (pp. 30–31). Louisiana State University. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1179106

Klien, G., Woods, D. D., Bradshaw, J. M., Hoffman, R. R., & Feltovich, P. J. (2004). Ten challenges for making automation a "team player" in joint human-agent activity. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 19(6), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2004.74

Kohavi, R., Crook, T., Longbotham, R., Frasca, B., Henne, R., Ferres, J. L., & Melamed, T. (2009). Online experimentation at Microsoft. Third Workshop on Data Mining Case Studies and Practice Prize, KDD 2009. http://ai.stanford.edu/~ronnyk/ExPThinkWeek2009Public.pdf

Kohavi, R., Tang, D., & Xu, Y. (2020). Trustworthy online controlled experiments: A practical guide to A/B testing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108653985

Kohavi, R., & Thomke, S. (2017). The surprising power of online experiments. Harvard Business Review, 95(5). https://hbr.org/2017/09/the-surprising-power-of-online-experiments

Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(24), 8788–8790. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320040111

Krueger, W., & Froehlich, B. (1994). The responsive workbench [virtual work environment]. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 14(3), 12–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.279036

Krug, S. et al. (2014). Don’t make me think, revisited. A Common Sense Approach to Web and Mobile Usability, 3.

Kumar, N., Adams, J. A., Buxton, B., Candy, L., César, P., Clark, L., Cowan, B. R., Dey, A. K., Toups Dugas, P. O., Edmonds, E. A., Goodrich, M. A., Green, M., Grudin, J., Kitamura, Y., Konstan, J., Latulipe, C., Lee, M., Malone, T., Mandryk, R. L., … Vinayagamoorthy, V. (2022). A chronology of SIGCHI conferences: 1983 to 2022. Interactions, 29(6), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568732

Landay, J. (2019). Smart interfaces for human‐centered AI. Stanford HAI News. https://hai.stanford.edu/news/smart-interfaces-human-centered-ai

Lanier, J. (1992). The sound of one hand. Virtual reality performance, SIGGRAPH ’92 Electronic Theater, Aerie Crown Theater, Chicago, 28–30 July 1992. https://jaronlanier.com/vr.html

Lanier, J. (1993). Music from inside virtual reality: The sound of one hand. Whole Earth Review. https://jaronlanier.com/vr.html

Lazar, J., Feng, J. H., & Hochheiser, H. (2017). Research methods in human-computer interaction (Second). Morgan Kaufmann.

Lee, H.-P. (Hank)., Sarkar, A., Tankelevitch, L., Drosos, I., Rintel, S., Banks, R., & Wilson, N. (2025). The impact of generative AI on critical thinking: Self-reported reductions in cognitive effort and confidence effects from a survey of knowledge workers. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713778

Liang, C. A., Munson, S. A., & Kientz, J. A. (2021). Embracing four tensions in human-computer interaction research with marginalized people. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 28(2). https://doi.org/10.1145/3443686

Licklider, J. C. (1960). Man-computer symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, 1, 4–11.

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology.

Lim, Y.-K., Stolterman, E., & Tenenberg, J. (2008). The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1145/1375761.1375762

Lin, Y., Guo, J., Chen, Y., Yao, C., & Ying, F. (2020). It is your turn: Collaborative ideation with a co-creative robot through sketch. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376258

Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C., & Brown, J. (2006). Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500330448

Liu, V., & Chilton, L. B. (2022). Design guidelines for prompt engineering text-to-image generative models. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501825

Ljungblad, S., Man, Y., Baytaş, M. A., Gamboa, M., Obaid, M., & Fjeld, M. (2021). What matters in professional drone pilots’ practice? An interview study to understand the complexity of their work and inform human-drone interaction research. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445737

Long, D., Jacob, M., & Magerko, B. (2019). Designing co-creative AI for public spaces. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Creativity and Cognition, 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3325504

MacKenzie, I. S., & Zhang, S. X. (1997). The immediate usability of Graffiti. Proceedings of the Graphics Interface 1997 Conference, 129–137. https://doi.org/10.20380/GI1997.15

MacLean, A., Young, R. M., Bellotti, V. M. E., & Moran, T. P. (1991). Questions, options, and criteria: Elements of design space analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 6(3–4), 201–250. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0603&4_2

MacLean, A., Young, R. M., & Moran, T. P. (1989). Design rationale: The argument behind the artifact. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 20(SI), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1145/67450.67497

Magnusson, T. (2010). Designing constraints: Composing and performing with digital musical systems. Computer Music Journal, 34(4), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1162/COMJ_a_00026

Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.62707/aishej.v9i3.335

Mancini, C., Lawson, S., & Juhlin, O. (2017). Animal-computer interaction: The emergence of a discipline. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 98, 129–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.10.003

Marshall, J., Rowland, D., Rennick Egglestone, S., Benford, S., Walker, B., & McAuley, D. (2011). Breath control of amusement rides. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978955

Marshall, P., Price, S., & Rogers, Y. (2003). Conceptualising tangibles to support learning. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 101–109.

Martin, C. (2018). PhaseRings (Version v1.3) [Computer software]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1237701

Martin, C. D. (1993). The myth of the awesome thinking machine. Commun. ACM, 36(4), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1145/255950.153587

Martin, C. P. (2016). PhaseRings for iPad ensemble and ensemble director agent [Musical Performance]. Musical Program of the International Conference on Auditory Display, 232–233. http://www.icad.org/icad2016/proceedings/concert/ICAD2016_paper_99.pdf

Martin, C. P. (2026a). IMPSY: An intelligent musical instrument platform (Versions v0.7.0-alpha) [Computer software]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2580175

Martin, C. P. (2026b, June). Opening the design space: Two years of performance with intelligent musical instruments. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. https://github.com/cpmpercussion/opening-the-design-space-slides

Martin, C. P., Glette, K., Nygaard, T. F., & Torresen, J. (2020). Understanding musical predictions with an embodied interface for musical machine learning. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 3, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00006

Martin, C. P., & Torresen, J. (2020). Data driven analysis of tiny touchscreen performance with MicroJam. Computer Music Journal, 43(4), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1162/COMJ_a_00536

Martin, C., Gardner, H., & Swift, B. (2014). Exploring percussive gesture on iPads with ensemble metatone. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1025–1028. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557226

Martin, C., Gardner, H., & Swift, B. (2015). Tracking ensemble performance on touch-screens with gesture classification and transition matrices. In E. Berdahl & J. Allison (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on new interfaces for musical expression (pp. 359–364). Louisiana State University. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1179130

Martin, C., Gardner, H., Swift, B., & Martin, M. (2016). Intelligent agents and networked buttons improve free-improvised ensemble music-making on touch-screens. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2295–2306. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858269

Mastrianni, A., Kulp, L., & Sarcevic, A. (2021). Transitioning to remote user-centered design activities in the emergency medical field during a pandemic. Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3443444

McCabe, G., & Thejll-Madsen, T. (2024). Reflection toolkit: What? So what? Now what? The University of Edinburgh. https://reflection.ed.ac.uk/reflectors-toolkit/reflecting-on-experience/what-so-what-now-what

McCarthy, J., & Wright, P. (2004). Technology as experience. Interactions, 11(5), 42–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/1015530.1015549

McDonald, N., Schoenebeck, S., & Forte, A. (2019). Reliability and inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: Norms and guidelines for CSCW and HCI practice. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 72:1–72:23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359174

McPherson, A., Morreale, F., & Harrison, J. (2019). Musical instruments for novices: Comparing NIME, HCI and crowdfunding approaches. In New directions in music and human-computer interaction (pp. 179–212). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92069-6_12

McPherson, A., Morrison, L., Davison, M., & Wanderley, M. M. (2024). On mapping as a technoscientific practice in digital musical instruments. Journal of New Music Research, 53(1-2), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/09298215.2024.2442356

Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information, E77-D(12), 1321–1329.

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158

Miranda, E. R., & Wanderley, M. (2006). New digital musical instruments: Control and interaction beyond the keyboard (computer music and digital audio series). A-R Editions, Inc.

Mitchell, M., Ghosh, A., Luccioni, A. S., & Pistilli, G. (2025). Fully autonomous AI agents should not be developed. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.02649

Moffatt v. Air Canada, 2024 BCCRT 149. (2024). Civil Resolution Tribunal of British Columbia, decision of 14 February 2024. https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bccrt/doc/2024/2024bccrt149/2024bccrt149.html

Moggridge, B. (2007). Designing interactions. MIT Press.

Mohaddesi, O., & Harteveld, C. (2020). The importance of pilot studies for gamified research: Pre-testing gamettes to study supply chain decisions. Extended Abstracts of the 2020 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 316–320. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383668.3419889

Morreale, F., & McPherson, A. (2017). Design for longevity: Ongoing use of instruments from NIME 2010-14. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, 192–197. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1176218

Morrison, C., Villar, N., Thieme, A., Ashktorab, Z., Taysom, E., Salandin, O., Cletheroe, D., Saul, G., Blackwell, A. F., Edge, D., et al. (2020). Torino: A tangible programming language inclusive of children with visual disabilities. Human–Computer Interaction, 35(3), 191–239.

Morriss, L. (2024). Themes do not emerge. An editor’s reflections on the use of braun and clarke’s thematic analysis. Qualitative Social Work, 23(5), 745–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250241277355

Müller, H., Sedley, A., & Ferrall-Nunge, E. (2014). Survey research in HCI. In J. S. Olson & W. A. Kellogg (Eds.), Ways of knowing in HCI (pp. 229–266). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_10

Mullet, K., & Sano, D. (1995). Designing visual interfaces: Communication oriented techniques. Prentice Hall.

Myers, B. A. (1998). A brief history of human-computer interaction technology. Interactions, 5(2), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/274430.274436

Nacenta, M. A., Kamber, Y., Qiang, Y., & Kristensson, P. O. (2013). Memorability of pre-designed and user-defined gesture sets. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1099–1108. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466142

Natale, S. (2021). Deceitful media: Artificial intelligence and social life after the turing test. Oxford University Press.

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australian Research Council (ARC), & Universities Australia. (2025). The national statement on ethical conduct in human research (2025). https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/national-statement-ethical-conduct-human-research-2025

National Transportation Safety Board. (2017). Collision between a car operating with automated vehicle control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck near Williston, Florida, May 7, 2016 (Nos. NTSB/HAR-17/02). National Transportation Safety Board. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/HAR1702.pdf

Norman, D. (2005). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic books.

Norman, D. A. (1986). Cognitive engineering. In User centered system design (pp. 31–62). CRC Press.

Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic Books.

Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y

Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science, 381(6654), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh2586

NSW Government. (2025). Persona creation. Digital NSW Website. https://www.digital.nsw.gov.au/delivery/digital-service-toolkit/resources/user-research-methods/persona-creation#anchor-persona-details

O’Conaill, B., Whittaker, S., & Wilbur, S. (1993). Conversations over video conferences: An evaluation of the spoken aspects of video-mediated communication. Human–Computer Interaction, 8(4), 389–428. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0804_4

Odom, W., Wakkary, R., Lim, Y., Desjardins, A., Hengeveld, B., & Banks, R. (2016). From research prototype to research product. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2549–2561. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858447

Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2023). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE guide no. 149. Medical Teacher, 45(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287

Olsen, D. R. (2007). Evaluating user interface systems research. Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1145/1294211.1294256

Ortony, A., Norman, D. A., & Revelle, W. (2012). Affect and proto-affect in effective functioning. In Who needs emotions?: The brain meets the robot. Oxford University Press.

Oviatt, S., Schuller, B., Cohen, P., Sonntag, D., & Potamianos, G. (2017). The handbook of multimodal-multisensor interfaces, volume 1: Foundations, user modeling, and common modality combinations. Morgan & Claypool.

Pang, R. Y., Schroeder, H., Smith, K. S., Barocas, S., Xiao, Z., Tseng, E., & Bragg, D. (2025). Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the impact of LLMs at CHI through a systematic literature review. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713726

Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(3), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.844354

Parnas, D. L., & Clements, P. C. (1986). A rational design process: How and why to fake it. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-12(2), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.1986.6312940

Perrow, C. (1999). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. New Brunswick, NJ.

Piggott, T., Morris, C., & Lee-Poy, M. (2015). Preceptor engagement in distributed medical school campuses. Canadian Medical Education Journal, 6(2), e21–e28. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.36726

Pigrem, J., & McPherson, A. P. (2018). Do we speak sensor? Cultural constraints of embodied interaction. In T. M. Luke Dahl Douglas Bowman (Ed.), Proceedings of the international conference on new interfaces for musical expression (pp. 382–385). Virginia Tech. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1302633

Pizza, S., Brown, B., McMillan, D., & Lampinen, A. (2016). Smartwatch in vivo. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 5456–5469. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858522

Poland, K., McKay, M. P., Bruce, D., & Becic, E. (2018). Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck. Traffic Injury Prevention, 19(sup2), S153–S156. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1532211

Porcheron, M., Fischer, J. E., & Reeves, S. (2021). Pulling back the curtain on the wizards of oz. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., 4(CSCW3). https://doi.org/10.1145/3432942

Porcheron, M., Fischer, J. E., Reeves, S., & Sharples, S. (2018). Voice interfaces in everyday life. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174214

Privato, N., Magnusson, T., & Einarsson, E. T. (2023). Magnetic interactions as a somatosensory interface. In M. Ortiz & A. Marquez-Borbon (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on new interfaces for musical expression (pp. 387–393). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11189218

Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512453827

Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau. (2018). Report and recommendations: Hawaii emergency management agency January 13, 2018 false alert. Federal Communications Commission. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-350119A1.pdf

Putnam, C., Puthenmadom, M., Cuerdo, M. A., Wang, W., & Paul, N. (2020). Adaptation of the system usability scale for user testing with children. Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382840

Raffaele, R., Carvalho, B., Lins, A., Marques, L., & Soares, M. M. (2016). Digital game for teaching and learning: An analysis of usability and experience of educational games. In A. Marcus (Ed.), Design, user experience, and usability: Novel user experiences (pp. 303–310). Springer International Publishing.

Reed, C. N. (2023). Imagining & sensing: Understanding and extending the vocalist-voice relationship through biosignal feedback [PhD thesis, Queen Mary University of London]. https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/89579

Rode, J. A. (2011). Reflexivity in digital anthropology. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978961

Rogers, Y. (2012). HCI theory: Classical, modern, and contemporary. Morgan; Claypool Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00418ED1V01Y201205HCI014

Rogers, Y., & Aldrich, F. (1996). In search of clickable dons: Learning about HCI through interacting with norman’s CD-ROM. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 28(3), 44–47.

Rogers, Y., Lim, Y., Hazlewood, W. R., & Marshall, P. (2009). Equal opportunities: Do shareable interfaces promote more group participation than single user displays? Human–Computer Interaction, 24(1-2), 79–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370020902739379

Rogers, Y., Paay, J., Brereton, M., Vaisutis, K. L., Marsden, G., & Vetere, F. (2014). Never too old: Engaging retired people inventing the future with MaKey MaKey. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3913–3922. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557184

Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., & Preece, J. (2023). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction, 6th edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://quicklink.anu.edu.au/kv9b

Rogerson, M. J., Sparrow, L. A., & Freeman, S. O. (2023). The SMeFT decks: A card-based ideation tool for designing hybrid digital boardgames for distanced play. Proceedings of the 34th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1145/3572921.3572933

Rooksby, J., Rost, M., Morrison, A., & Chalmers, M. (2015). Pass the ball: Enforced turn-taking in activity tracking. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2417–2426. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702577

Rossiter, D. G. (2018). Past, present & future of information technology in pedometrics. Geoderma, 324, 131–137.

Rudd, J., Stern, K., & Isensee, S. (1996). Low vs. High-fidelity prototyping debate. Interactions, 3(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/223500.223514

Rumsey, N. (2018). Remove the new Snapchat update. Change.org petition. https://www.change.org/p/snap-inc-remove-the-new-snapchat-update

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1978). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.

Saffer, D. (2010). Designing for interaction: Creating smart applications and clever devices. New Riders Press, Indianapolis. https://anu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61ANU_INST/1alil8h/alma991026813681207631

Satchell, C., & Dourish, P. (2009). Beyond the user: Use and non-use in HCI. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/1738826.1738829

Schaadhardt, A., Hiniker, A., & Wobbrock, J. O. (2021). Understanding blind screen-reader users’ experiences of digital artboards. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445242

Schkolne, S., Pruett, M., & Schröder, P. (2001). Surface drawing: Creating organic 3D shapes with the hand and tangible tools. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1145/365024.365114

Shaer, O., Hornecker, E., et al. (2010). Tangible user interfaces: Past, present, and future directions. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction, 3(1–2), 4–137.

Shanahan, M., McDonell, K., & Reynolds, L. (2023). Role play with large language models. Nature, 623(7987), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06647-8

Sharma, M., Tong, M., Korbak, T., Duvenaud, D., Askell, A., Bowman, S. R., Cheng, N., Durmus, E., Hatfield-Dodds, Z., Johnston, S. R., Kravec, S., Maxwell, T., McCandlish, S., Ndousse, K., Rausch, O., Schiefer, N., Yan, D., Zhang, M., & Perez, E. (2023). Towards understanding sycophancy in language models. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.13548

Shen, J. H., & Tamkin, A. (2026). How AI impacts skill formation. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.20245

Shneiderman, B. (1992). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Addison-Wesley.

Shneiderman, B. (2000). Universal usability. Commun. ACM, 43(5), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1145/332833.332843

Shneiderman, B. (2007). Creativity support tools: Accelerating discovery and innovation. Commun. ACM, 50(12), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/1323688.1323689

Shneiderman, B. (2022). Human-centered AI. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845290.001.0001

Shneiderman, B., Fischer, G., Czerwinski, M., Resnick, M., Myers, B., Candy, L., Edmonds, E., Eisenberg, M., Giaccardi, E., Hewett, T., Jennings, P., Kules, B., Nakakoji, K., Nunamaker, J., Pausch, R., Selker, T., Sylvan, E., & Terry, M. (2006). Creativity support tools: Report from a u.s. National science foundation sponsored workshop. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 20(2), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc2002_1

Shneiderman, B., & Maes, P. (1997). Direct manipulation vs. Interface agents. Interactions, 4(6), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1145/267505.267514

Shneiderman, B., & Muller, M. (2023). On AI anthropomorphism. Medium, Human-Centered AI. https://medium.com/human-centered-ai/on-ai-anthropomorphism-abff4cecc5ae

Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., Jacobs, S., Elmqvist, N., & Diakopoulos, N. (2018). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction, 6th edition. Pearson. https://quicklink.anu.edu.au/kv9b

Simkute, A., Tankelevitch, L., Kewenig, V., Scott, A. E., Sellen, A., & Rintel, S. (2024). Ironies of generative AI: Understanding and mitigating productivity loss in human-AI interaction. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2405782

Singh, A., Dechant, M. J., Patel, D., Soubutts, E., Barbareschi, G., Ayobi, A., & Newhouse, N. (2025). Exploring positionality in HCI: Perspectives, trends, and challenges. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713280

Snap Inc. (2017). Q3 2017 earnings call transcript. Prepared remarks and Q&A, 7 November 2017. https://s25.q4cdn.com/442043304/files/transcript/snap-q3-2017-earnings-transcript.pdf

Snap Inc. (2018a). Form 10-Q: Quarterly report for the period ended March 31, 2018. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filing. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001564408/000156459018010080/snap-10q_20180331.htm

Snap Inc. (2018b). Form 10-Q: Quarterly report for the period ended June 30, 2018. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filing. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001564408/000156459018020094/snap-10q_20180630.htm

Soro, A., Brereton, M., & Roe, P. (2016). Towards an analysis framework of technology habituation by older users. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 1021–1033. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901806

Speicher, M., Hall, B. D., & Nebeling, M. (2019). What is mixed reality? Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15.

Spelmezan, D., Jacobs, M., Hilgers, A., & Borchers, J. (2009). Tactile motion instructions for physical activities. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2243–2252.

Steed, A., Pan, Y., Watson, Z., & Slater, M. (2018). “We wait”—the impact of character responsiveness and self embodiment on presence and interest in an immersive news experience. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00112

Subramonyam, H., Pea, R., Pondoc, C., Agrawala, M., & Seifert, C. (2024). Bridging the gulf of envisioning: Cognitive challenges in prompt based interactions with LLMs. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642754

Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge University Press.

Sutherland, I. E. (1968). A head-mounted three dimensional display. Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, Fall Joint Computer Conference, Part i, 757–764. https://doi.org/10.1145/1476589.1476686

Tahmidul Karim, F., Zabin, S. Md. S., Tarin, I., Nurain, N., & Islam, A. B. M. A. A. (2025). Beyond the blackout: Qualitative insights and sentiment analysis on the impact, adaptation, and design solutions during the internet shutdown in bangladesh. Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706599.3719895

Tanaka, A. (2010). Mapping out instruments, affordances, and mobiles. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, 88–93. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1177903

Terry, G., & Hayfield, N. (2021). Essentials of thematic analysis. American Psychological Association.

Todd, P. M., Rogers, Y., & Payne, S. J. (2011). Nudging the trolley in the supermarket: How to deliver the right information to shoppers. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction, 3(2), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.4018/jmhci.2011040102

Toews, R. (2020). Leading women in the field of AI. forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/robtoews/2020/12/13/8-leading-women-in-the-field-of-ai/.

Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., & Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0953-5438(00)00031-x

Trajkova, M., Deshpande, M., Knowlton, A., Monden, C., Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2023). AI meets holographic pepper’s ghost: A co-creative public dance experience. Companion Publication of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 274–278. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563703.3596658

Trajkova, M., Long, D., Deshpande, M., Knowlton, A., & Magerko, B. (2024). Exploring collaborative movement improvisation towards the design of LuminAI—a co-creative AI dance partner. Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642677

Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5

Trudeau, G. (1993). Doonesbury. Comic strip, 27 August 1993, syndicated by Universal Press. https://www.gocomics.com/doonesbury/1993/08/27

Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence (1950). Mind, 49, 433–460.

UIUX Trend. (2024). Measuring system usability scale (SUS). UIUX Trend. https://uiuxtrend.com/measuring-system-usability-scale-sus/

Ullmer, B., Ishii, H., & Jacob, R. J. (2005). Token+ constraint systems for tangible interaction with digital information. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12(1), 81–118.

Ullmer, B., Shaer, O., Mazalek, A., & Hummels, C. (2022). Weaving fire into form: Aspirations for tangible and embodied interaction. Morgan & Claypool.

Vaccaro, M., Almaatouq, A., & Malone, T. (2024). When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(12), 2293–2303. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02024-1

Veen, J. (2000). The art and science of web design. Pearson Education.

Verma, I. M. (2014). Editorial expression of concern: Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(29), 10779. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1412469111

Wang, G. (2014). Ocarina: Designing the iPhone’s magic flute. Computer Music Journal, 38(2), 8–21.

Wang, Y., & Ma, S. (2024). Unspoken. In L. S. Pardue & P. Dahlstedt (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on new interfaces for musical expression (pp. 76–77). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17553285

Wang, Y., & Martin, C. P. (2022). Cubing Sound: Designing a NIME for Head-mounted Augmented Reality. International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression.

Wang, Y., Xi, M., Adcock, M., & Martin, C. P. (2023). Mobility, space and sound activate expressive musical experience in augmented reality. In M. Ortiz & A. Marquez-Borbon (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on new interfaces for musical expression (pp. 128–133). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11189129

Wang, Y., Xi, M., Adcock, M., & Patrick Martin, C. (2025). Seeing the sound: Supporting musical collaboration with augmented reality. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Creativity and Cognition, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1145/3698061.3726905

Webber, S., Carter, M., Smith, W., & Vetere, F. (2020). Co-designing with orangutans: Enhancing the design of enrichment for animals. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 1713–1725. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395559

Wessel, D., & Wright, M. (2002). Problems and prospects for intimate musical control of computers. Comput. Music J., 26(3), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1162/014892602320582945

Wobbrock, J. O., Findlater, L., Gergle, D., & Higgins, J. J. (2011). The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978963

Wobbrock, J. O., & Kientz, J. A. (2016). Research contributions in human-computer interaction. Interactions, 23(3), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/2907069

Woods, D. D. (2017). Essential characteristics of resilience. In Resilience engineering (pp. 21–34). CRC Press.

Yohanan, S., & MacLean, K. E. (2008). The haptic creature project: Social human-robot interaction through affective touch. Proceedings of the AISB 2008 Symposium on the Reign of Catz & Dogs: The Second AISB Symposium on the Role of Virtual Creatures in a Computerised Society, 1, 7–11.

Yohanan, S., & MacLean, K. E. (2011). Design and assessment of the haptic creature’s affect display. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1145/1957656.1957820

Zamfirescu-Pereira, J. D., Wong, R. Y., Hartmann, B., & Yang, Q. (2023). Why johnny can’t prompt: How non-AI experts try (and fail) to design LLM prompts. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581388

Zhu, J., Chang, S., Zhao, R., & Kao, C. H.-L. (2025). LivingLoom: Investigating human-plant symbiosis through integrating living plants into (e-)textiles. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713156

Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Evenson, S. (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704

Zimmerman, J., Stolterman, E., & Forlizzi, J. (2010). An analysis and critique of research through design: Towards a formalization of a research approach. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858228