Reference List

This is a list of all reference used throughout the course.

ACI ’24: Proceedings of the international conference on animal-computer interaction. (2024). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3702336
Adiwangsa, M., Bransky, K., Wood, E., & Sweetser, P. (2025). A game of ChARades: Using role-playing and mimicry with and without tangible objects to ideate immersive augmented reality experiences. Companion Publication of the 2025 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 440–445. https://doi.org/10.1145/3715668.3736382
Adiwangsa, M., Sweetser, P., Stevenson, D., Suominen, H., & Xi, M. (2024). Exploring opportunities for augmenting homes to support exercising. Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3641897
Alavi, H. S., Churchill, E. F., Wiberg, M., Lalanne, D., Dalsgaard, P., Fatah gen Schieck, A., & Rogers, Y. (2019). Introduction to human-building interaction (hbi) interfacing hci with architecture and urban design. In ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) (No. 2; Vol. 26, pp. 1–10). ACM New York, NY, USA.
Alexander, J., Roudaut, A., Steimle, J., Hornbæk, K., Bruns Alonso, M., Follmer, S., & Merritt, T. (2018). Grand challenges in shape-changing interface research. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–14.
Alharthi, S. A., Alsaedi, O., Toups Dugas, P. O., Tanenbaum, T. J., & Hammer, J. (2018). Playing to wait: A taxonomy of idle games. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174195
Ambe, A. H., Brereton, M., Soro, A., & Roe, P. (2017). Technology individuation: The foibles of augmented everyday objects. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 6632–6644. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025770
Apple Developer. (2019). Human interface guidelines. https://developer.apple.com/design/human-interface-guidelines/ios/overview/themes/.
Baalman, M. (2022). Composing interactions: An artist’s guide to building expressive interactive systems. V2_Publishing.
Babich, N. (2018). The do’s and don’ts of mobile UX design. https://theblog.adobe.com/10-dos-donts-mobile-ux-design.
Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3), 114–123.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128
Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Anderson, B., Jacobs, R., Golembewski, M., Jirotka, M., Stahl, B. C., Timmermans, J., Giannachi, G., Adams, M., Farr, J. R., Tandavanitj, N., & Jennings, K. (2015). The ethical implications of HCI’s turn to the cultural. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 22(5). https://doi.org/10.1145/2775107
Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Crabtree, A., Flintham, M., Walker, B., Marshall, J., Koleva, B., Rennick Egglestone, S., Giannachi, G., Adams, M., Tandavanitj, N., & Row Farr, J. (2013). Performance-led research in the wild. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1145/2491500.2491502
Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1997). Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. https://doi.org/0.5555/2821566
Bidwell, N. J., Reitmaier, T., Marsden, G., & Hansen, S. (2010). Designing with mobile digital storytelling in rural africa. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1593–1602. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753564
Billinghurst, M., Clark, A., & Lee, G. (2015). A survey of augmented reality. now. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000049
Blaikie, N. W. H. (1991). A critique of the use of triangulation in social research. Quality and Quantity, 25(2), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145701
Blandford, A., & Furniss, D. (2006). DiCoT: A methodology for applying distributed cognition to the design of teamworking systems. In Interactive systems. Design, specification, and verification (pp. 26–38). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11752707_3
Boden, M. A. (1998). Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 103(1), 347–356. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00055-1
Bødker, S. (2006). When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182476
Bødker, S. (2015). Third-wave HCI, 10 years later—participation and sharing. Interactions, 22(5), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2804405
Boren, T., & Ramey, J. (2000). Thinking aloud: Reconciling theory and practice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 43(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1109/47.867942
Bouchet, J., & Nigay, L. (2004). ICARE: A component-based approach for the design and development of multimodal interfaces. CHI’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1325–1328. https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986055
Bown, O. (2021). Beyond the creative species: Making machines that make art and music. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10913.001.0001
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage Publications.
Brooke, J. (1995). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind., 189.
Brown, B., Weilenmann, A., McMillan, D., & Lampinen, A. (2016). Five provocations for ethical HCI research. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 852–863. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858313
Bryson, J. j. (2020). The artificial intelligence of the ethics of artificial intelligence: An introductory overview for law. The Oxford Handbook of the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.
Budd, A. (2007). Heuristics for modern WEb application development. https://andybudd.com/archives/2007/01/heuristics_for_modern_web_application_de
Buxton, B. (1997). Artists and the art of the luthier. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph., 31(1), 10–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/248307.248315
Buxton, B. (2007). Sketching user experiences: Getting the design right and the right design. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of braun and clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
Caine, K. (2016). Local standards for sample size at CHI. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 981–992. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858498
Candy, L., & Ferguson, S. (2014). Interactive experience in the digital age: Evaluating new art practice (L. Candy & S. Ferguson, Eds.). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04510-8
Carden, F. (2023). Personas: Learn how to discover your audience, understand them, and pivot to address their needs. Digital.gov website. https://digital.gov/2023/05/19/personas-learn-how-to-discover-your-audience-understand-them-and-pivot-to-address-their-needs
Carroll, E. A., & Latulipe, C. (2009). The creativity support index. CHI ’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4009–4014. https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520609
Carroll, J. M. (2004). Beyond fun. Interactions, 11(5), 38–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/1015530.1015547
Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (1992). Getting around the task-artifact cycle: How to make claims and design by scenario. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 10(2), 181–212. https://doi.org/10.1145/146802.146834
Carter, S., & Mankoff, J. (2005). When participants do the capturing: The role of media in diary studies. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 899–908. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055098
Chai, M. Z., Soro, A., Roe, P., & Brereton, M. (2017). Cooking together at a distance: Sustain connectedness for long distance families. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2437–2444. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053183
Chamberlain, A., Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., Jones, M., & Rogers, Y. (2012). Research in the wild: Understanding “in the wild” approaches to design and development. Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 795–796. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318078
Chen, Z., Lu, Y., Nieminen, M. P., & Lucero, A. (2020). Creating a chatbot for and with migrants: Chatbot personality drives co-design activities. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395495
Cheng, A., Yang, L., & Andersen, E. (2017). Teaching language and culture with a virtual reality game. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 541–549. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025857
Cherry, E., & Latulipe, C. (2014). Quantifying the creativity support of digital tools through the creativity support index. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1145/2617588
Chignell, M., Wang, L., Zare, A., & Li, J. (2023). The evolution of HCI and human factors: Integrating human and artificial intelligence. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1145/3557891
Choi, M., Andres, J., Hunter, A., & Martin, C. P. (2025). Scenario-based design to envision how GenAI can support sound design practices. Proceedings of the 36th Australasian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 640–646. https://doi.org/10.1145/3726986.3727042
Choi, M., Andres, J., & Martin, C. P. (2024). Tonal cognition in sonification: Exploring the needs of practitioners in sonic interaction design. Proceedings of the 19th International Audio Mostly Conference: Explorations in Sonic Cultures, 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1145/3678299.3678321
Clegg, T., Boston, C., Preece, J., Warrick, E., Pauw, D., & Cameron, J. (2020). Community-driven informal adult environmental learning: Using theory as a lens to identify steps toward concientización. The Journal of Environmental Education, 51(1), 55–71.
Cohen, M. H., Giangola, J. P., & Balogh, J. (2004). Voice user interface design. Addison-Wesley Professional.
Cooper, A., Reimann, R., Cronin, D., & Noessel, C. (2014). About face: The essentials of interaction design. John Wiley & Sons.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications.
Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., Tolmie, P., & Button, G. (2009). Ethnography considered harmful. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 879–888. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518835
Dam, R. F., & Siang, T. Y. (2020). Design thinking: Get started with prototyping. Interaction Design Foundation website. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/design-thinking-get-started-with-prototyping
Dam, R. F., & Siang, T. Y. (2025). Personas - a simple introduction. Interaction Design Foundation Website. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/personas-why-and-how-you-should-use-them
David, R. A., & Nielsen, P. (2016). Defense science board summer study on autonomy.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, N., Hsiao, C., Singh, K. Y., Lin, B., & Magerko, B. (2017). Quantifying collaboration with a co-creative drawing agent. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst., 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1145/3009981
DeCuir-Gunby, J. T., Marshall, P. L., & McCulloch, A. W. (2011). Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: An example from a professional development research project. Field Methods, 23(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X10388468
Delwiche, L. D., & Slaughter, S. J. (2019). The little SAS book: A primer. SAS institute.
Deng, J., Olivier, P., Andres, J., Ellis, K., Wee, R., & Floyd Mueller, F. (2022). Logic bonbon: Exploring food as computational artifact. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501926
Deng, L., & Huang, X. (2004). Challenges in adopting speech recognition. Communications of the ACM, 47(1), 69–75.
Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543
Design Council. (2025). The double diamond: A universally accepted depiction of the design process. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-resources/the-double-diamond/
Desjardins, A., Tomico, O., Lucero, A., Cecchinato, M. E., & Neustaedter, C. (2021). Introduction to the special issue on first-person methods in HCI. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 28(6). https://doi.org/10.1145/3492342
Dix, A., Ormerod, T., Twidale, M., Sas, C., Silva, P. A., & McKnight, L. (2006). Why bad ideas are a good idea. HCI Educators Workshop 2006. https://alandix.com/academic/papers/HCIed2006-badideas/HCIED2006-badideas-CRC-v2.pdf
Doorley, S., Holcomb, S., Klebahn, P., Segovia, K., & Utley, J. (2018). Design thinking bootleg. Stanford dSchool website. https://dschool.stanford.edu/tools/design-thinking-bootleg
Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. MIT press.
Dourish, P. (2006). Implications for design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 541–550. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124855
Dumas, B., Lalanne, D., & Oviatt, S. (2009). Multimodal interfaces: A survey of principles, models and frameworks. In Human machine interaction: Research results of the mmi program (pp. 3–26). Springer.
Edmonds, E. (2010). The art of interaction. Digital Creativity, 21(4), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2010.556347
Edmonds, E. (2018). The art of interaction: What HCI can learn from interactive art. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00825ED1V01Y201802HCI039
Ehn, P. (2008). Participation in design things. Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008, 92–101.
Erickson, T. D. (1995). Working with interface metaphors. In R. M. Baecker, J. Grudin, W. A. S. Buxton, & S. Greenberg (Eds.), Readings in human-computer interaction (pp. 147–151). Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-051574-8.50018-2
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215
Eysenck, M. W., & Brysbaert, M. (2023). Fundamentals of cognition (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003384694
Fan, M., Shi, S., & Truong, K. N. (2020). Practices and challenges of using think-aloud protocols in industry: An international survey. Journal of Usability Studies, 15(2), 85–102. https://uxpajournal.org/practices-challenges-think-aloud-protocols-survey/
Fiesler, C., & Proferes, N. (2018). “Participant” perceptions of Twitter research ethics. Social Media + Society, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366
Finn, K., & Johnson, J. (2016). Designing for an aging population: Toward universal design. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1011–1012. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2856669
Fishkin, K. P. (2004). A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8(5), 347–358.
Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(6), 381.
Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061470
Françoise, J., Fdili Alaoui, S., & Candau, Y. (2022). CO/DA: Live-coding movement-sound interactions for dance improvisation. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501916
Frauenberger, C. (2019). Entanglement HCI the next wave? ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3364998
Frayling, C. (1993). Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1), 1–5.
Gaver, B., & Bowers, J. (2012). Annotated portfolios. Interactions, 19(4), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212877.2212889
Gaver, B., Dunne, T., & Pacenti, E. (1999). Design: Cultural probes. Interactions, 6(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291235
Gaver, W. (2012). What should we expect from research through design? Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 937–946. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538
Gentner, D., & Nielsen, J. (1996). The anti-mac interface. Commun. ACM, 39(8), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/232014.232032
Gibbons, S. (2018). Journey mapping 101. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/journey-mapping-101/
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company.
Google. (2020). Crazy 8’s. Google Design Sprint Kit webpage. https://designsprintkit.withgoogle.com/methodology/phase3-sketch/crazy-8s
Gould, J. D., & Lewis, C. (1985). Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Commun. ACM, 28(3), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1145/3166.3170
Greenberg, S., Carpendale, S., Marquardt, N., & Buxton, B. (2012). Sketching user experiences: The workbook. Morgan Kaufmann.
Greenwold, S. (2003). Spatial computing [Master’s thesis]. School of Architecture; Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Groom, V., & Nass, C. (2007). Can robots be teammates?: Benchmarks in human–robot teams [Journal Article]. Interaction Studies, 8(3), 483–500. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/is.8.3.10gro
Hallewell, M. J., Hughes, N., Large, D. R., Harvey, C., Springthorpe, J., & Burnett, G. (2022). Deriving personas to inform HMI design for future autonomous taxis: A case study on user requirement elicitation. Journal of Usability Studies, 17(2).
Harrison, J., Jack, R. H., Morreale, F., & McPherson, A. P. (2018). When is a guitar not a guitar? Cultural form, input modality and expertise. In T. M. Luke Dahl Douglas Bowman (Ed.), Proceedings of the international conference on new interfaces for musical expression (pp. 299–304). Virginia Tech. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1302589
Hart, S. G. (2006). NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(9), 904–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909
Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. 52, 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
Hooper, S., Preston, A., Balaam, M., Seedhouse, P., Jackson, D., Pham, C., Ladha, C., Ladha, K., Plötz, T., & Olivier, P. (2012). The french kitchen: Task-based learning in an instrumented kitchen. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370246
Hornbæk, K., Kristensson, P. O., & Oulasvirta, A. (2025). Introduction to human-computer interaction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192864543.001.0001
Hornecker, E. (2005). A design theme for tangible interaction: Embodied facilitation. ECSCW 2005: Proceedings of the Ninth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 18–22 September 2005, Paris, France, 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4023-7_2
Houde, S., & Hill, C. (1997). What do prototypes prototype? In M. G. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P. V. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 367–381). North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044481862-1.50082-0
Hutchins, E. L., Hollan, J. D., & Norman, D. A. (1986). Direct manipulation interfaces. In User centered system design (pp. 87–124). CRC Press. https://worrydream.com/refs/Hutchins_1985_-_Direct_Manipulation_Interfaces.pdf
Ishii, H., & Ullmer, B. (1997). Tangible bits: Towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 234–241.
Je, S., Lim, H., Moon, K., Teng, S.-Y., Brooks, J., Lopes, P., & Bianchi, A. (2021). Elevate: A walkable pin-array for large shape-changing terrains. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445454
Jeon, M., Fiebrink, R., Edmonds, E. A., & Herath, D. (2019). From rituals to magic: Interactive art and HCI of the past, present, and future. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 131, 108–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.06.005
Jordà, S. (2010). The reactable: Tangible and tabletop music performance. In CHI’10 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2989–2994).
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401\_2
Kahn, R. L., & Cannell, C. F. (1957). The dynamics of interviewing; theory, technique, and cases. John Wiley & Sons.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus; Giroux.
Kaptein, M. C., Nass, C., & Markopoulos, P. (2010). Powerful and consistent analysis of likert-type rating scales. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2391–2394. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753686
Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B., Bødker, S., Carroll, J., Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Winograd, T. (2003). Post-cognitivist HCI: Second-wave theories. CHI ’03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 692–693. https://doi.org/10.1145/765891.765933
King, A. (2008). In vivo coding. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n240
Klein, L. (2014). What do we actually mean by “sociotechnical”? On values, boundaries and the problems of language. Applied Ergonomics, 45(2), 137–142.
Kleinberger, R., Dublon, G., Paradiso, J. A., & Machover, T. (2015). PHOX ears: A parabolic, head-mounted, orientable, eXtrasensory listening device. In E. Berdahl & J. Allison (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on new interfaces for musical expression (pp. 30–31). Louisiana State University. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1179106
Klien, G., Woods, D. D., Bradshaw, J. M., Hoffman, R. R., & Feltovich, P. J. (2004). Ten challenges for making automation a "team player" in joint human-agent activity. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 19(6), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2004.74
Krueger, W., & Froehlich, B. (1994). The responsive workbench [virtual work environment]. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 14(3), 12–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.279036
Krug, S. et al. (2014). Don’t make me think, revisited. A Common Sense Approach to Web and Mobile Usability, 3.
Kumar, N., Adams, J. A., Buxton, B., Candy, L., César, P., Clark, L., Cowan, B. R., Dey, A. K., Toups Dugas, P. O., Edmonds, E. A., Goodrich, M. A., Green, M., Grudin, J., Kitamura, Y., Konstan, J., Latulipe, C., Lee, M., Malone, T., Mandryk, R. L., … Vinayagamoorthy, V. (2022). A chronology of SIGCHI conferences: 1983 to 2022. Interactions, 29(6), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568732
Landay, J. (2019). Smart interfaces for human‐centered AI. Stanford HAI News. https://hai.stanford.edu/news/smart-interfaces-human-centered-ai
Lanier, J. (1992). The sound of one hand. Virtual reality performance, SIGGRAPH ’92 Electronic Theater, Aerie Crown Theater, Chicago, 28–30 July 1992. https://jaronlanier.com/vr.html
Lanier, J. (1993). Music from inside virtual reality: The sound of one hand. Whole Earth Review. https://jaronlanier.com/vr.html
Lazar, J., Feng, J. H., & Hochheiser, H. (2017). Research methods in human-computer interaction (Second). Morgan Kaufmann.
Liang, C. A., Munson, S. A., & Kientz, J. A. (2021). Embracing four tensions in human-computer interaction research with marginalized people. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 28(2). https://doi.org/10.1145/3443686
Licklider, J. C. (1960). Man-computer symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, 1, 4–11.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology.
Lim, Y.-K., Stolterman, E., & Tenenberg, J. (2008). The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1145/1375761.1375762
Lin, Y., Guo, J., Chen, Y., Yao, C., & Ying, F. (2020). It is your turn: Collaborative ideation with a co-creative robot through sketch. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376258
Ljungblad, S., Man, Y., Baytaş, M. A., Gamboa, M., Obaid, M., & Fjeld, M. (2021). What matters in professional drone pilots’ practice? An interview study to understand the complexity of their work and inform human-drone interaction research. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445737
Long, D., Jacob, M., & Magerko, B. (2019). Designing co-creative AI for public spaces. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Creativity and Cognition, 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3325504
MacLean, A., Young, R. M., Bellotti, V. M. E., & Moran, T. P. (1991). Questions, options, and criteria: Elements of design space analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 6(3–4), 201–250. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0603&4_2
MacLean, A., Young, R. M., & Moran, T. P. (1989). Design rationale: The argument behind the artifact. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 20(SI), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1145/67450.67497
Magnusson, T. (2010). Designing constraints: Composing and performing with digital musical systems. Computer Music Journal, 34(4), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1162/COMJ_a_00026
Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.62707/aishej.v9i3.335
Mancini, C., Lawson, S., & Juhlin, O. (2017). Animal-computer interaction: The emergence of a discipline. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 98, 129–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.10.003
Marshall, J., Rowland, D., Rennick Egglestone, S., Benford, S., Walker, B., & McAuley, D. (2011). Breath control of amusement rides. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978955
Marshall, P., Price, S., & Rogers, Y. (2003). Conceptualising tangibles to support learning. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 101–109.
Martin, C. (2018). PhaseRings (Version v1.3) [Computer software]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1237701
Martin, C. D. (1993). The myth of the awesome thinking machine. Commun. ACM, 36(4), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1145/255950.153587
Martin, C. P. (2016). PhaseRings for iPad ensemble and ensemble director agent [Musical Performance]. Musical Program of the International Conference on Auditory Display, 232–233. http://www.icad.org/icad2016/proceedings/concert/ICAD2016_paper_99.pdf
Martin, C. P., Glette, K., Nygaard, T. F., & Torresen, J. (2020). Understanding musical predictions with an embodied interface for musical machine learning. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 3, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00006
Martin, C. P., & Torresen, J. (2020). Data driven analysis of tiny touchscreen performance with MicroJam. Computer Music Journal, 43(4), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1162/COMJ_a_00536
Martin, C., Gardner, H., & Swift, B. (2014). Exploring percussive gesture on iPads with ensemble metatone. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1025–1028. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557226
Martin, C., Gardner, H., & Swift, B. (2015). Tracking ensemble performance on touch-screens with gesture classification and transition matrices. In E. Berdahl & J. Allison (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on new interfaces for musical expression (pp. 359–364). Louisiana State University. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1179130
Martin, C., Gardner, H., Swift, B., & Martin, M. (2016). Intelligent agents and networked buttons improve free-improvised ensemble music-making on touch-screens. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2295–2306. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858269
Mastrianni, A., Kulp, L., & Sarcevic, A. (2021). Transitioning to remote user-centered design activities in the emergency medical field during a pandemic. Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3443444
McCabe, G., & Thejll-Madsen, T. (2024). Reflection toolkit: What? So what? Now what? The University of Edinburgh. https://reflection.ed.ac.uk/reflectors-toolkit/reflecting-on-experience/what-so-what-now-what
McCarthy, J., & Wright, P. (2004). Technology as experience. Interactions, 11(5), 42–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/1015530.1015549
McDonald, N., Schoenebeck, S., & Forte, A. (2019). Reliability and inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: Norms and guidelines for CSCW and HCI practice. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 72:1–72:23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359174
McPherson, A., Morrison, L., Davison, M., & Wanderley, M. M. (2024). On mapping as a technoscientific practice in digital musical instruments. Journal of New Music Research, 53(1-2), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/09298215.2024.2442356
Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information, E77-D(12), 1321–1329.
Miranda, E. R., & Wanderley, M. (2006). New digital musical instruments: Control and interaction beyond the keyboard (computer music and digital audio series). A-R Editions, Inc.
Moggridge, B. (2007). Designing interactions. MIT Press.
Mohaddesi, O., & Harteveld, C. (2020). The importance of pilot studies for gamified research: Pre-testing gamettes to study supply chain decisions. Extended Abstracts of the 2020 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 316–320. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383668.3419889
Morrison, C., Villar, N., Thieme, A., Ashktorab, Z., Taysom, E., Salandin, O., Cletheroe, D., Saul, G., Blackwell, A. F., Edge, D., et al. (2020). Torino: A tangible programming language inclusive of children with visual disabilities. Human–Computer Interaction, 35(3), 191–239.
Morriss, L. (2024). Themes do not emerge. An editor’s reflections on the use of braun and clarke’s thematic analysis. Qualitative Social Work, 23(5), 745–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250241277355
Müller, H., Sedley, A., & Ferrall-Nunge, E. (2014). Survey research in HCI. In J. S. Olson & W. A. Kellogg (Eds.), Ways of knowing in HCI (pp. 229–266). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_10
Mullet, K., & Sano, D. (1995). Designing visual interfaces: Communication oriented techniques. Prentice Hall.
Myers, B. A. (1998). A brief history of human-computer interaction technology. Interactions, 5(2), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/274430.274436
Natale, S. (2021). Deceitful media: Artificial intelligence and social life after the turing test. Oxford University Press.
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australian Research Council (ARC), & Universities Australia. (2025). The national statement on ethical conduct in human research (2025). https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/national-statement-ethical-conduct-human-research-2025
Norman, D. (2005). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic books.
Norman, D. A. (1986). Cognitive engineering. In User centered system design (pp. 31–62). CRC Press.
Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic Books.
Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
NSW Government. (2025). Persona creation. Digital NSW Website. https://www.digital.nsw.gov.au/delivery/digital-service-toolkit/resources/user-research-methods/persona-creation#anchor-persona-details
Odom, W., Wakkary, R., Lim, Y., Desjardins, A., Hengeveld, B., & Banks, R. (2016). From research prototype to research product. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2549–2561. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858447
Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2023). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE guide no. 149. Medical Teacher, 45(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287
Ortony, A., Norman, D. A., & Revelle, W. (2012). Affect and proto-affect in effective functioning. In Who needs emotions?: The brain meets the robot. Oxford University Press.
Oviatt, S., Schuller, B., Cohen, P., Sonntag, D., & Potamianos, G. (2017). The handbook of multimodal-multisensor interfaces, volume 1: Foundations, user modeling, and common modality combinations. Morgan & Claypool.
Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(3), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.844354
Parnas, D. L., & Clements, P. C. (1986). A rational design process: How and why to fake it. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-12(2), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.1986.6312940
Perrow, C. (1999). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. New Brunswick, NJ.
Piggott, T., Morris, C., & Lee-Poy, M. (2015). Preceptor engagement in distributed medical school campuses. Canadian Medical Education Journal, 6(2), e21–e28. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.36726
Pigrem, J., & McPherson, A. P. (2018). Do we speak sensor? Cultural constraints of embodied interaction. In T. M. Luke Dahl Douglas Bowman (Ed.), Proceedings of the international conference on new interfaces for musical expression (pp. 382–385). Virginia Tech. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1302633
Poland, K., McKay, M. P., Bruce, D., & Becic, E. (2018). Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck. Traffic Injury Prevention, 19(sup2), S153–S156. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1532211
Porcheron, M., Fischer, J. E., & Reeves, S. (2021). Pulling back the curtain on the wizards of oz. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., 4(CSCW3). https://doi.org/10.1145/3432942
Porcheron, M., Fischer, J. E., Reeves, S., & Sharples, S. (2018). Voice interfaces in everyday life. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174214
Privato, N., Magnusson, T., & Einarsson, E. T. (2023). Magnetic interactions as a somatosensory interface. In M. Ortiz & A. Marquez-Borbon (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on new interfaces for musical expression (pp. 387–393). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11189218
Putnam, C., Puthenmadom, M., Cuerdo, M. A., Wang, W., & Paul, N. (2020). Adaptation of the system usability scale for user testing with children. Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382840
Raffaele, R., Carvalho, B., Lins, A., Marques, L., & Soares, M. M. (2016). Digital game for teaching and learning: An analysis of usability and experience of educational games. In A. Marcus (Ed.), Design, user experience, and usability: Novel user experiences (pp. 303–310). Springer International Publishing.
Reed, C. N. (2023). Imagining & sensing: Understanding and extending the vocalist-voice relationship through biosignal feedback [PhD thesis, Queen Mary University of London]. https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/89579
Ricchetti, M. (2012). What really makes social games “social”? Demystifying social mechanics in online multiplayer games, from MMOs to farming sims. Conference talk, Game Developers Conference (GDC) 2012, San Francisco. https://www.gdcvault.com/play/1015724/What-Really-Makes-Social-Games
Rode, J. A. (2011). Reflexivity in digital anthropology. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978961
Rogers, Y. (2012). HCI theory: Classical, modern, and contemporary. Morgan; Claypool Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00418ED1V01Y201205HCI014
Rogers, Y., & Aldrich, F. (1996). In search of clickable dons: Learning about HCI through interacting with norman’s CD-ROM. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 28(3), 44–47.
Rogers, Y., Paay, J., Brereton, M., Vaisutis, K. L., Marsden, G., & Vetere, F. (2014). Never too old: Engaging retired people inventing the future with MaKey MaKey. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3913–3922. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557184
Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., & Preece, J. (2023). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction, 6th edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://quicklink.anu.edu.au/kv9b
Rogerson, M. J., Sparrow, L. A., & Freeman, S. O. (2023). The SMeFT decks: A card-based ideation tool for designing hybrid digital boardgames for distanced play. Proceedings of the 34th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1145/3572921.3572933
Rossiter, D. G. (2018). Past, present & future of information technology in pedometrics. Geoderma, 324, 131–137.
Rudd, J., Stern, K., & Isensee, S. (1996). Low vs. High-fidelity prototyping debate. Interactions, 3(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/223500.223514
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1978). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
Saffer, D. (2010). Designing for interaction: Creating smart applications and clever devices. New Riders Press, Indianapolis. https://anu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61ANU_INST/1alil8h/alma991026813681207631
Satchell, C., & Dourish, P. (2009). Beyond the user: Use and non-use in HCI. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/1738826.1738829
Schaadhardt, A., Hiniker, A., & Wobbrock, J. O. (2021). Understanding blind screen-reader users’ experiences of digital artboards. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445242
Schkolne, S., Pruett, M., & Schröder, P. (2001). Surface drawing: Creating organic 3D shapes with the hand and tangible tools. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1145/365024.365114
Scneiderman, B. (1992). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Addison-Wesley.
Shaer, O., Hornecker, E., et al. (2010). Tangible user interfaces: Past, present, and future directions. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction, 3(1–2), 4–137.
Shneiderman, B. (2000). Universal usability. Commun. ACM, 43(5), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1145/332833.332843
Shneiderman, B. (2007). Creativity support tools: Accelerating discovery and innovation. Commun. ACM, 50(12), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/1323688.1323689
Shneiderman, B. (2022). Human-centered AI. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845290.001.0001
Shneiderman, B., Fischer, G., Czerwinski, M., Resnick, M., Myers, B., Candy, L., Edmonds, E., Eisenberg, M., Giaccardi, E., Hewett, T., Jennings, P., Kules, B., Nakakoji, K., Nunamaker, J., Pausch, R., Selker, T., Sylvan, E., & Terry, M. (2006). Creativity support tools: Report from a u.s. National science foundation sponsored workshop. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 20(2), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc2002_1
Shneiderman, B., & Maes, P. (1997). Direct manipulation vs. Interface agents. Interactions, 4(6), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1145/267505.267514
Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., Jacobs, S., Elmqvist, N., & Diakopoulos, N. (2018). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction, 6th edition. Pearson. https://quicklink.anu.edu.au/kv9b
Soro, A., Brereton, M., & Roe, P. (2016). Towards an analysis framework of technology habituation by older users. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 1021–1033. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901806
Speicher, M., Hall, B. D., & Nebeling, M. (2019). What is mixed reality? Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15.
Spelmezan, D., Jacobs, M., Hilgers, A., & Borchers, J. (2009). Tactile motion instructions for physical activities. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2243–2252.
Steed, A., Pan, Y., Watson, Z., & Slater, M. (2018). “We wait”—the impact of character responsiveness and self embodiment on presence and interest in an immersive news experience. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00112
Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge University Press.
Sutherland, I. E. (1968). A head-mounted three dimensional display. Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, Fall Joint Computer Conference, Part i, 757–764. https://doi.org/10.1145/1476589.1476686
Tahmidul Karim, F., Zabin, S. Md. S., Tarin, I., Nurain, N., & Islam, A. B. M. A. A. (2025). Beyond the blackout: Qualitative insights and sentiment analysis on the impact, adaptation, and design solutions during the internet shutdown in bangladesh. Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706599.3719895
Tanaka, A. (2010). Mapping out instruments, affordances, and mobiles. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, 88–93. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1177903
Terry, G., & Hayfield, N. (2021). Essentials of thematic analysis. American Psychological Association.
Toews, R. (2020). Leading women in the field of AI. forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/robtoews/2020/12/13/8-leading-women-in-the-field-of-ai/.
Trajkova, M., Deshpande, M., Knowlton, A., Monden, C., Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2023). AI meets holographic pepper’s ghost: A co-creative public dance experience. Companion Publication of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 274–278. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563703.3596658
Trajkova, M., Long, D., Deshpande, M., Knowlton, A., & Magerko, B. (2024). Exploring collaborative movement improvisation towards the design of LuminAI—a co-creative AI dance partner. Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642677
Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence (1950). Mind, 49, 433–460.
UIUX Trend. (2024). Measuring system usability scale (SUS). UIUX Trend. https://uiuxtrend.com/measuring-system-usability-scale-sus/
Ullmer, B., Ishii, H., & Jacob, R. J. (2005). Token+ constraint systems for tangible interaction with digital information. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12(1), 81–118.
Ullmer, B., Shaer, O., Mazalek, A., & Hummels, C. (2022). Weaving fire into form: Aspirations for tangible and embodied interaction. Morgan & Claypool.
Veen, J. (2000). The art and science of web design. Pearson Education.
Wang, G. (2014). Ocarina: Designing the iPhone’s magic flute. Computer Music Journal, 38(2), 8–21.
Wang, Y., & Martin, C. P. (2022). Cubing Sound: Designing a NIME for Head-mounted Augmented Reality. International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression.
Wang, Y., Xi, M., Adcock, M., & Patrick Martin, C. (2025). Seeing the sound: Supporting musical collaboration with augmented reality. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Creativity and Cognition, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1145/3698061.3726905
Webber, S., Carter, M., Smith, W., & Vetere, F. (2020). Co-designing with orangutans: Enhancing the design of enrichment for animals. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 1713–1725. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395559
Wessel, D., & Wright, M. (2002). Problems and prospects for intimate musical control of computers. Comput. Music J., 26(3), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1162/014892602320582945
Wobbrock, J. O., Findlater, L., Gergle, D., & Higgins, J. J. (2011). The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978963
Wobbrock, J. O., & Kientz, J. A. (2016). Research contributions in human-computer interaction. Interactions, 23(3), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/2907069
Woods, D. D. (2017). Essential characteristics of resilience. In Resilience engineering (pp. 21–34). CRC Press.
Yohanan, S., & MacLean, K. E. (2008). The haptic creature project: Social human-robot interaction through affective touch. Proceedings of the AISB 2008 Symposium on the Reign of Catz & Dogs: The Second AISB Symposium on the Role of Virtual Creatures in a Computerised Society, 1, 7–11.
Yohanan, S., & MacLean, K. E. (2011). Design and assessment of the haptic creature’s affect display. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1145/1957656.1957820
Zhu, J., Chang, S., Zhao, R., & Kao, C. H.-L. (2025). LivingLoom: Investigating human-plant symbiosis through integrating living plants into (e-)textiles. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713156
Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Evenson, S. (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704
Zimmerman, J., Stolterman, E., & Forlizzi, J. (2010). An analysis and critique of research through design: Towards a formalization of a research approach. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858228